NATIONAL POLICY MATTERS |
|||||||||||||
| What is Happening with the Community Choice Act? | ||||||||||||
The Community Choice Act (CCA) is gaining some real traction in Congress and with the Administration. In the past few weeks, there have been serious discussions about taking important steps to ending Medicaid’s institutional bias and including the CCA’s key provisions in the health care reform bill. Many of these discussions have focused on creating a new Medicaid state option known as the Community First Choice (CFC) Option that includes the core elements of the CCA.
In order to receive federal matching funds, states must abide by the federal Medicaid law. This law basically defines what states: 1) must do; 2) can choose to do (referred to as an “option”); and 3) cannot do. As long as states comply with the federal law, they are free to set their own guidelines regarding eligibility and services. There are a number of reasons why the CFC option would be better for people with disabilities. The most important ones are outlined in the chart below comparing what states are allowed to do under each.
The other very important benefit is that an HCBS option would provide the legitimacy and prominence that a waiver does not have. For the first time, HCBS would be on the list of what states can chose to do instead of the exception to that list. In other words, the option would help to expedite an end to Medicaid’s institutional bias.
No. The 1915(c) waiver will still be allowed. States would simply be allowed to choose the CFC option. However, if a state chooses the CFC option, they would have to adhere to its higher standards (no caps on services, no waiting lists, no geographic restrictions.)
It also has support from the cross-disability community, including leaders from the National Council for Independent Living (NCIL), ADAPT, the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD), the American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD), Self Advocates Becoming Empowered (SABE) and others.
On July 24, President Obama met with twelve representatives of the disability community, along with Attorney General Holder and Secretary of Labor Solis. The Arc and UCP’s Marty Ford participated in the meeting representing The Arc and UCP as well as the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities. A broad range of issues were addressed, including Olmstead enforcement, health care reform, and the need to end the institutional bias in Medicaid.
Make community-based services a state option. Medicaid Law will be amended toallow state Medicaid plan coverage of community-based attendant services and supports for certain Medicaid-eligible individuals. Specify that the services under this option would include assistance with: · Activities of daily living (ADLs). These include eating, toileting, grooming, dressing, bathing, and transferring. · Instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). These include meal planning and preparation; managing finances; shopping for food, clothing, and other essential items; performing essential household chores; communicating by phone and other media; and traveling around and participating in the community · Health-related tasks. Health-related tasks are defined as those tasks that can be delegated or assigned by licensed health-care professionals under state law. Specify that services would be performed by an attendant through hands-on assistance, supervision, or cueing. Specify that services would also include assistance in learning the skills necessary for the individual to accomplish these tasks him/herself; back-up systems; and voluntary training on selection and management of attendants. Exclude certain expenditures, including room and board; services provided under IDEA and the Rehabilitation Act; assistive technology devices and services; durable medical equipment; and home modifications. Require that there be a written plan for home and community based services. Require that services are made available statewide and that they be provided in the most integrated setting appropriate for the individual. Require services to be provided regardless of age, disability, or type of services needed. Require states to establish and maintain a comprehensive, continuous quality assurance system. Require service delivery models to include consumer directed, agency-based, and other models, and require states to comply with all federal and state labor laws. Require states to establish a Development and Implementation Council, the majority of whose members must be individuals with disabilities, elderly individuals, and their representatives. Require states to report to Congress. Prohibit CFC services from affecting the states’ ability to provide such services under other Medicaid provisions.
The federal government would provide more funding to states that use it. The CFC option contains a significant enhanced federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP). The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is currently estimating how much this would cost the federal government (known as “scoring”). This cost estimate is expected to be completed in the next few weeks.
There is no way to know at this point. It will depend, to a certain extent, on how much additional FMAP states can get. It is worth noting, however, that some states already provide community based services only and serve people with disabilities well despite the low bar set by the 1915(c) waiver. In Vermont, for example, all Medicaid funding goes toward community-based housing and everyone lives in homes with fewer than seven people. Learn more about how state Medicaid HCBS programs rank in UCP’s new report, “A Case for Inclusion 2009.”
Passage of health care reform legislation is far from certain. This is, in part, due to its very high cost. The cost estimates for a mandatory CCA program are, in the opinion of Congressional leaders, prohibitive. |
Subscribe/Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | The Arc Website |